Wednesday, 1 June 2016

What is a smart TV?

What is a smart TV?

Simply put, a smart TV is a TV that can connect to the internet. Some have web browsers built in, and most have access to apps that let the TVs access popular services like Netflix, YouTube, Amazon Instant Video, and Hulu Plus.
Keep in mind that these features, even at their best, tend to be inferior to dedicated devices like Roku boxes, Fire sticks, or Apple TV. Smart TVs’ integrated smart functions are often buggy and slow compared to stand-alone solutions.
Whether or not you want your TV to have apps, nearly all TVs released in 2015 are smart TVs. Only entry-level TVs with poor picture quality have no smart functionality at all. If you want a good TV, you’ll need to get a smart TV.

Samsung Smart TV 2015

Samsung Smart TV
9.0 Overall
9.0 Remote
9.0 Design
9.0 Usability
8.0 Web Browser
9.0 Extra Features
Smart TVOur ScoreOSRemote
Samsung KU63007.2/10Tizen (2016)Smart
Samsung J52006.3/10TizenBasic
Samsung J55006.2/10TizenBasic
Samsung J62007.3/10Tizen (2014)Basic
Samsung J63007.2/10TizenBasic
Samsung JU64007.5/10TizenBasic
Samsung JU65007.2/10TizenBasic
Samsung JU67007.1/10TizenSmart
Samsung JU71007.7/10TizenSmart
Samsung JU75007.9/10TizenSmart
Samsung KS80008.1/10Tizen (2016)Smart
Samsung JS70007.5/10TizenBasic
Samsung JS85008.1/10TizenSmart
Samsung KS90008.2/10Tizen (2016)
Samsung JS90008.1/10TizenSmart
Samsung KS95008.2/10Tizen (2016)Smart
Samsung JS95007.9/10TizenSmart
Samsung’s smart offerings took a bit of a step back this year. There are fewer apps now that the platform has moved to the Tizen OS, but on the whole, the OS feels familiar and fairly intuitive to use.
The remote is sleek and works very well, though the lack of buttons could make finding your way around tricky at first. Samsung’s navigation guides (found in the menus) are useful in figuring out how to get around with voice and motion control.
The browser is pretty quick, though it was not able to handle all the HTML 5 tests we ran it through. An LG TV, by comparison, handled those just fine.
Right now Samsung has a good, but not stellar, smart system, though that should improve with time.  For reviews of picture quality, check out our reviews of Samsung’s 2015 lineup.

Sony’s Android TV 2015

Sony Smart TV
7.5 Overall
6.0 Remote
9.0 Design
7.0 Usability
7.0 Web Browser
8.0 Extra Features
Smart TVOur ScoreOSRemote
Sony W600D6.5/10BasicBasic
Sony R510C6.8/10BasicBasic
Sony W800C7.1/10AndroidBasic
Sony W850C6.7/10AndroidBasic
Sony X810C7.6/10AndroidBasic
Sony X830C7.1/10AndroidBasic
Sony X850D7.6/10AndroidBasic
Sony X850C7.5/10AndroidSmart
Sony X900C7.5/10AndroidSmart
Sony X930D7.9/10AndroidBasic
Sony X930C7.9/10AndroidSmart
Sony’s Android TV interface is nice and clean, and the apps that are present work well. Unfortunately, the selection is still pretty limited, though most of the popular apps are now available.
The included remote isn’t very good, and the touchpad remote is also pretty poor. For most people, the TV Sideview app for iOS and Android will likely be the best way to control and navigate the TV. You also get Google cast functionality, which is pretty useful.
You have a couple of different options for browsing the web on this TV, including Opera and Google Chrome,
If you want an attractive smart OS and don’t mind the relatively few apps, a Sony smart TV is a good choice. For more on Sony's various TVs, check out our reviews of Sony’s 2015 lineup.

LG WebOS 2.0 2015

LG Smart TV
9.0 Overall
9.5 Remote
10 Design
10 Usability
8.0 Web Browser
6.0 Extra Features
Smart TVOur ScoreOSRemote
LG UH77007.4/10WebOS 3.0Smart
LG LF58006.6/10BasicBasic
LG LF61006.5/10BasicBasic
LG LF63006.5/10WebOSSmart
LG UF64006.6/10WebOSBasic
LG UF68006.5/10WebOSSmart
LG UF76006.9/10WebOSSmart
LG UF77006.8/10WebOSSmart
LG UH85007.8/10WebOSSmart
LG UF85006.9/10WebOSSmart
LG UF95007.3/10WebOSSmart
LG EC93008.5/10WebOSSmart
LG EG91008.5/10WebOSSmart
LG EF95008.8/10WebOSSmart
LG EG96008.8/10WebOSSmart
LG’s WebOS smart platform continues to impress, with a gorgeous interface and great motion and voice-enabled remote.
The browser is a bit slow, though it did pass the Peacekeeper HTML 5 test, which Samsung’s did not. It also now has more apps than Samsung’s smart TVs (though we expect that will change with time).
If you don’t have complex needs and want an attractive, functional interface, LG’s is the one to beat.
For reviews of LG TVs’ picture quality, please see our reviews of LG's 2015 LED TVs.

Vizio Smart TV 2015

Vizio Smart TV
6.5 Overall
7.0 Remote
7.0 Design
7.0 Usability
0 Web Browser
5.0 Extra Features
Vizio’s smart TV platform is pretty limited. It’s fine for accessing the basics – things like Netflix, Hulu Plus, or YouTube – but there’s not much selection beyond that.
The remote doesn’t have advanced features like motion control or voice input, but the M and P-series remotes do have a QWERTY keyboard on the back. All the Vizio remotes do have buttons for launching Netflix, Amazon Instant, and iHeart Radio, which let you skip the app launcher and get directly into those three apps.
They’re nothing fancy, and you won’t be blown away by the amount of things you can do, but Vizio’s smart features at least get the job done. For the picture quality of Vizio’s TVs, take a look at our full coverage of Vizio's 2015 lineup.

Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo Smartphone "Review"

Samsung Galaxy S5 Neo Smartphone

Review 



New revision. The Galaxy S5 Neo from Samsung is the new version of the former flagship smartphone Galaxy S5. Is it an inexpensive alternative to the current Galaxy S6?

For the original German review, see here.
Unlike the previous generations, Samsung has not so far announced a Mini version of its flagship smartphone Galaxy S6. Instead, the Korean manufacturer now offers the Galaxy S5 Neo, which is based on the old top model Galaxy S5 for price-conscious users. On the outside, you can hardly distinguish any differences between the two devices, but there are some small changes. Samsung has discarded the Snapdragon 801 and uses its own Exynos SoC. There are some changes to the cameras as well, but some features have been removed. The Galaxy S5 Neo also takes care of two issues of the current S6, because besides the replaceable battery, you can now expand the storage via microSD-card.
Over the course of this review, we will obviously compare the results with the old Galaxy S5 and the current Galaxy S6. Other rivals for the review unit are the Huawei P8, the OnePlus 2 as well as the Motorola Moto X Play.

Processor
Graphics adapter
Memory
2048 MB 
Display
5.1 inch 16:9, 1920x1080 pixel, capacitive, 10 touch points, Super AMOLED, glossy: yes
Storage
16 GB eMMC Flash, 16 GB 
, 10.1 GB free
Weight
145 g ( = 5.11 oz / 0.32 pounds), Power Supply: 53 g ( = 1.87 oz / 0.12 pounds)
Price
400 Euro

You can immediately see that the review unit is a Galaxy S5, even though there are some small but important differences between the new S5 Neo and the Galaxy S5. For example, Samsung has dispensed with the fake leather back. The pattern is still there, but you can clearly see that the back is made of plastic. This creates a nice package, especially for our silver test sample, but you can also get the smartphone in gold and white. Fingerprints are not a big issue for the Galaxy S5 Neo.
The ports are a welcome improvement since they are now encapsulated, so you do not need the additional covers anymore. The smartphone is still dust-resistant and waterproof (up to 1 meter/~3 ft; for 30 minutes) according to IP67. The notification to close the back cover properly is rather annoying, because it appears after every restart. 
The home button has also changed and there is no fingerprint reader anymore. The physical buttons are well integrated, but both the volume rocker as well as the power button are rather loud when you press them, which slightly affect the quality impression. We have already mentioned that you can remove the cover at the back to get access to the battery. The latter also has to be removed if you want to access the two slots for the SIM card and the SD-card (both Micro).
Once again, we can hear some quiet creaking sounds when we twist the device or apply a lot of pressure. However, we could not provoke ripples on the display and the overall stability is good. Overall, the case once again leaves a good impression, even though it cannot quite keep up with the sophistication and the stability of the new Samsung Galaxy S6.